[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]

RE: [lojban] Moss and lichen

To: <lojban@yahoogroups.com>
Subject: RE: [lojban] Moss and lichen
From: "Craig" <ragnarok@pobox.com>
Date: Tue, 30 Oct 2001 06:34:15 -0500
Importance: Normal
In-reply-to: <0110292141520I.01133@neofelis>
Reply-to: <ragnarok@pobox.com>

>> I'd go with Moss, since it is definable as one organism. Lichen is two in
>> symbiosis, and it thus less useful for taxonomy, which I know is what you
>> are using it for.

>But if it is moss, what do we call lichen? And if it is lichen, what do we
>call moss? Besides, lichens are classified taxonomically; they are mostly
>ascomycetes, IIRR. They are classified by the fungus component.

That's insane! But how about: Lichen = rokci clika; Moss = spatykai clika

References:
- Re: [lojban] Moss and lichen
  - From: Pierre Abbat <phma@oltronics.net>

Prev by Date: Lessons & Brochure updates
Next by Date: Re: [lojban] a construal of lo'e & le'e
Previous by thread: Re: [lojban] Moss and lichen
Next by thread: Re: Moss and lichen
Index(es):
- Date
- Thread