Re: [lojban] SE--FA interaction

[And Rosta <arosta@uclan.ac.uk>]

>>> John Cowan <jcowan@reutershealth.com> 10/30/01 04:35pm >>>
#And Rosta wrote:
#> AFAICR, FA numbering applies to the OUTPUT of SE conversion. Is this correct?
#
#Correct.

The discussion of word orders has prompted me to revive a once-abandoned
exercise of working out the easiest way to order 5 sumti places (i) in a bridi
for each relevant possible position of the selbri, and (ii) in a sumti tail (where
selbri position is fixed and x1 can't be fa-tagged).

Has anybody ever bothered to do this before & written up the results?

--And.