Re: [lojban] updated gismu list

[Rob Speer <rob@twcny.rr.com>]

On Thu, Nov 01, 2001 at 04:25:53PM -0800, Robin Lee Powell wrote:
> That's correct, compounds were not counted.
> 
> It was a gismu list count anyways.

If you think cmavo should not be counted, they should be in a separate
section of the list and not sorted with the rest.

However, I think it would be useful to know how often the cmavo which
are considered important enough to be in the gismu list are used.

Also, if the previous data on frequency only involved mailing list
messages, I think it should be disregarded; frequency in actual text is
much more important.

--
la rab.spir
noi sarji zo gumri