Re: [lojban] lo with discourse-scope?

[Rob Speer <rob@twcny.rr.com>]

On Fri, Nov 02, 2001 at 04:53:08PM -0500, pycyn@aol.com wrote:
> In a message dated 11/2/2001 11:36:03 AM Central Standard Time, 
> rlpowell@digitalkingdom.org writes:
> 
> 
> > Uhhh, doesn't da keep its binding until changed?
> > 
> > That's certainly how I use it.
> > 
> 
> Once more (with feeling): Officially, the scope of {da} (its binding) runs 
> out at the next unadorned {i} or similar break marker or at {da'o}, whichever 
> comes first.

If this is official, show us where it is in the Book and/or in Lojban usage.

Furthermore, if this is official, why was da'o created?

Is this as official as your "Record" on the new, improved, utterly
broken {ce'u}?

-- 
la rab.spir
noi sarji zo gumri