Re: [lojban] Digest Number 1127

[Rob Speer <rob@twcny.rr.com>]

On Thu, Nov 15, 2001 at 06:37:48AM +0100, G. Dyke wrote:
> > 
> > > **ti ve'arpinxe
> > 
> > Isn't that someone who drinks children? :-)
> 
> yes... ti ve'arselpinxe

What possible justification is there to coin a lujvo for "is a drink for
children"? Is there some highly specific place structure you hope to get
out of it? If not, what's wrong with {verba se pinxe}, which is not only
easier to read but _shorter_?

-- 
la rab.spir
noi na sarji le nu duskemjvozba
gi'e na ka'e bacru zo duskemjvozba