[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]

Re: [lojban] The bigness of a set

To: <lojban@yahoogroups.com>
Subject: Re: [lojban] The bigness of a set
From: Invent Yourself <xod@sixgirls.org>
Date: Sat, 1 Dec 2001 00:39:54 -0500 (EST)
In-reply-to: <4.3.2.7.2.20011201003119.04f31100@pop.cais.com>

Typically "lo'i ratcu" means {the set of rats}. In this case it means {the
cardinality of the set of rats}.





-- 
The tao that can be tar(1)ed
is not the entire Tao.
The path that can be specified
is not the Full Path.

Follow-Ups:
- Re: [lojban] The bigness of a set
  - From: Jay Kominek <jay.kominek@colorado.edu>

References:
- Re: [lojban] The bigness of a set
  - From: "Bob LeChevalier (lojbab)" <lojbab@lojban.org>

Prev by Date: Re: [lojban] The bigness of a set
Next by Date: Re: [lojban] The bigness of a set
Previous by thread: Re: [lojban] The bigness of a set
Next by thread: Re: [lojban] The bigness of a set
Index(es):
- Date
- Thread