[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]
Re: [lojban] morphology
At 12:18 PM 12/1/01 -0500, Pierre Abbat wrote:
There will have to be some sort of arbitration about new brivla, to prevent
one new word from getting two incompatible meanings.
No, there doesn't HAVE to be such an arbitration. There is a RISK if there
is no arbitration that different people will come up with different
meanings, but that risk will exist even if there is arbitration, because
not all users will read and follow the dictates of the arbitrators (look at
all the unofficial gismu that people use; inevitably there will be a conflict).
There has been a debate since the early 80s about whether there should be a
Loglan Academy. TLI has one; LLG does not. French has one; English does
not. It seems to be an ideological thing whether people want there to be
someone with the authority to tell them what to do.
The status quo is that Lojban will have no academy. We will produce a
baseline dictionary, but it makes no pronouncements on any word that is not
in it, and the likelihood now is that it will primarily have words that
have seen significant and agreed upon usage. We have no restrictions on
anyone else producing unofficial dictionaries or lists of brivla with their
opinions, but there is no mechanism for arbitrating if two unofficial
people disagree. The only time when there is arbitration therefore is
whenever there is an official dictionary edition put out that will include
a particular word, and that arbitration counts only insofar as the official
dictionary is considered a prescriptive standard, which is doubtful once
the baseline period ends.
lojbab
--
lojbab lojbab@lojban.org
Bob LeChevalier, President, The Logical Language Group, Inc.
2904 Beau Lane, Fairfax VA 22031-1303 USA 703-385-0273
Artificial language Loglan/Lojban: http://www.lojban.org