sticky nau (was: Re: [lojban] Logical translation request

[Invent Yourself <xod@sixgirls.org>]

On Tue, 18 Dec 2001, Rob Speer wrote:

> On Mon, Dec 17, 2001 at 10:45:47PM -0500, Bob LeChevalier (lojbab) wrote:
> > It can, but as naujeki (or naujoiki)
>
> Is there any particular reason for this? Similarly, for the CAhA selma'o
> and the fact that CAhA + NAI is ungrammatical?
>
> I've probably expressed this before, but I think that the separation of
> tense selma'o is going to be the first thing to go when the baseline
> ends - which would for the most part bring the language more in line
> with usage anyway, and with the goal to remove restrictions on thought.


Well why would anybody want to stick nau? It's already the default!



-- 
The tao that can be tar(1)ed
is not the entire Tao.
The path that can be specified
is not the Full Path.