Re: [lojban] Logical translation request

[Invent Yourself <xod@sixgirls.org>]

On Tue, 18 Dec 2001, Bob LeChevalier (lojbab) wrote:

> At 12:14 AM 12/18/01 -0500, Rob Speer wrote:
>
> >Is there any particular reason for this? Similarly, for the CAhA selma'o
> >and the fact that CAhA + NAI is ungrammatical?
>
> Probably it is ungrammatical either because a) we never thought of adding a
> rule for CAhA+NAI because we couldn't think of what such a thing might
> mean



This seems to bias s-w effects, doesn't it?



-- 
The tao that can be tar(1)ed
is not the entire Tao.
The path that can be specified
is not the Full Path.