RE: [lojban] Bible translation style question

["Craig" <ragnarok@pobox.com>]

>                       In addition, any normative style is going to
>be strongly SAE-influenced at this stage, which is to'e lojbo.

Lojban is already quite SAE. There is no way that you are going to tell me
that it is oligosynthetic, which if I understand Whorf right is the other
alternative. Furthermore, it distinguishes past, present, and future tenses
(as opposed to Hopi, for example, which has past+present material things
versus future+present immaterial things)

                             --la kreig.daniyl.

     '.i do cu vanci le ba panje xusra
     .i denci gunma le se gidva'

xy.sy. gubmau ckiku nacycme:  0x5C3A1E74