[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]
Re: Truth Value of UI (was: Re: UI for 'possible' (was: Re: [lojban] Bibletranslation style question)
- To: lojban <lojban@yahoogroups.com>
- Subject: Re: Truth Value of UI (was: Re: UI for 'possible' (was: Re: [lojban] Bibletranslation style question)
- From: Invent Yourself <xod@sixgirls.org>
- Date: Thu, 31 Jan 2002 11:00:40 -0500 (EST)
- In-reply-to: <sc596906.097@gwise-gw1.uclan.ac.uk>
On Thu, 31 Jan 2002, And Rosta wrote:
> Xod:
>
> I have argued that ".ui" has a truth value. It is "true" when the speaker
> is actually happy. All utterances have truth value, even "ouch!".
> *******************************************
>
> Your contention is incorrect. The difference between "ui" and "mi gleki"
> is precisely that only the latter has a truth value.
How do you intend to prove to me that ".ui" lacks a truth value?
--
The tao that can be tar(1)ed
is not the entire Tao.
The path that can be specified
is not the Full Path.