[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]
Re: Truth Value of UI (was: Re: UI for 'possible' (was: Re: [lojban] Bibletranslation style question)
- To: lojban@yahoogroups.com
- Subject: Re: Truth Value of UI (was: Re: UI for 'possible' (was: Re: [lojban] Bibletranslation style question)
- From: Invent Yourself <xod@sixgirls.org>
- Date: Sun, 3 Feb 2002 22:06:36 -0500 (EST)
- In-reply-to: <00bb01c1acf0$3ae06ec0$a02103d5@oemcomputer>
On Sun, 3 Feb 2002, G. Dyke wrote:
> <And and Xod exchange various proposals, one of them thinks UI have truth
> values, the other doesn't ; I can't figure out what their various arguments
> have to do with it>
>
> I think I'm with And, but I'm not sure...
Can you draw a real distinction between ".ui" and "mi gleki"? And thinks
he can, but hasn't been able to convince me that he has.
--
The tao that can be tar(1)ed
is not the entire Tao.
The path that can be specified
is not the Full Path.