Re: [lojban] Re: [lojban-beginners] Non-logical AND in Tanru?

[EWC <thanatos@dim.com>]

On Fri, 15 Feb 2002 09:24:23 EST, pycyn@aol.com wrote:
>> If the bridi containing the
>> tanru is true, then the tertau holds true for some arguments (given in
>> the bridi) and the seltau holds true for some arguments (left
>> unspecified unless made explicit).  If {mi broda klama} is true, then
>> there must exist something that is broda for me to stand in an ambiguous
>> broda klama relation to.

>Nice.
>I'm not sure it is unqualifiedly true

Well, if {no da broda} is true, what meaning could {mi broda klama}
possibly have?  If there weren't any real, imagined, or theoretical
things that were broda, what meaning would broda have?  And then what of
{mi broda klama}?

-- 
EWC