[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]
RE: [lojban] Linguistic universals and Lojban
- To: <lojban@yahoogroups.com>
- Subject: RE: [lojban] Linguistic universals and Lojban
- From: "And Rosta" <a.rosta@ntlworld.com>
- Date: Sun, 17 Feb 2002 02:11:34 -0000
- Importance: Normal
- In-reply-to: <0202161814510C.02774@neofelis>
Pierre:
> Here's the 231st:
>
> If constituent order is rigid (or if there is no case inflection), then the
> gradation of adjectives is expressed by function words; if constituent order
> is flexible (or if there is case inflection), then the gradation of
> adjectives is expressed inflectionally.
>
> If I understand this correctly, constituent order is semirigid in Lojban;
> there is an order such that cases need not be marked. There is no case
> inflection; rather, cases are marked by words preceding the sumti. But the
> gradation of "adjectives" is expressed by suffixes (-mau, -me'a, -rai). Am I
> misunderstanding the rule, or does Lojban violate the rule?
-mau is a compounded stem, not an inflection. Lojban does comparatives
and superlatives by neither function words nor inflections.
--And.