Re: [lojban] Lisp (was: Programming Languages for Lojban)

[Björn Gohla <b.gohla@gmx.de>]

-----BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-----
Hash: SHA1

On Wednesday 13 March 2002 11:51, John Cowan wrote:
> Jim Carter scripsit:
> > I don't know all that much about Lisp, but my impression is that it is
> > much more a procedural language. And if its pattern recognition code were
> > written in a highly procedural fashion, the result would be achingly
> > slow.
>
> Lisp need not be slow; that's a mental hangover from the days when
> all Lisp systems were interpreters.  Already back in the 70s Lisp
> numerical code ran as fast as Fortran.
>
> Lisp (especially its Scheme dialect) is fundamentally an Algol-style
> language, but with cheap object creation, garbage collection, local
> variables and function pointers (the two together are much sweeter
> than just local variables as in Pascal or just function pointers as
> in C), and first-class continuations (which provides for easy
> non-local control flow).  It is greatly superior, as was said of
> Algol 60, to almost all of its successors.

not to forget macros, which i expect to be quite powerful in what we want to 
do. the known c preprocessor macros are but a faint shadow of scheme macros, 
wich are really in effect extensions to the interpreter (or the compiler).

i remember reading a scholarly comparison of c(++), java and lisp. compiled 
lisp code was comparable to c++ but obviously not as fast as c code. lisp 
showed the up as the language with the best average development time for a 
number of programming exercises. although that leaves the question wether 
good programmers choose lisp (or scheme) or using those languages makes you 
one good programmer ;) . i will port the url.
- -- 
panic ("No CPUs found.  System halted.\n");
        2.4.3 linux/arch/parisc/kernel/setup.c
pub  1024D/834F4976 2001-01-07 Björn Gohla (Wissenschaftler, Weltbürger) 
<b.gohla@gmx.de>
     Key fingerprint = 9FF4 FEDA CCDF DA0E 14D5  8129 6C14 3C39 834F 4976
sub  1024g/29571FE2 2001-01-07
-----BEGIN PGP SIGNATURE-----
Version: GnuPG v1.0.4 (GNU/Linux)
Comment: For info see http://www.gnupg.org

iD8DBQE8jz0WbBQ8OYNPSXYRAvU3AKDAkIB6zUjhXXcBLn5T13mZPsPCZACfT2bm
r2KraGAbgoOBcclV2mJMA/4=
=yK9Q
-----END PGP SIGNATURE-----