RE: [lojban] Whorf Hypothesis in Scientific American

["And Rosta" <a.rosta@ntlworld.com>]

> http://www.scientificamerican.com/explorations/2002/032502language/
> 
> The SA article in turn points to
> 
> http://www.sunflower.com/~dewatson/alford.htm
> 
> which has an extensive set of papers that are pro-Whorfian hypothesis.  I 
> haven't had time to read these though.
> 
> lojbab

The author of those papers has always struck me as a massive loony.
A massive New Age loony. (Loony, not fool.)

--And.