ce'u once again

[Nick Nicholas <opoudjis@optushome.com.au>]

Sorry to scratch old wounds, but I'm revising the lessons now that 
I've got a spare couple of days, and inevitably my discussion of {ka} 
comes up for review. I'd like people to have a look at it, now 
tempers have died down, and tell me if they think it coheres.

In particular, a reviewer suggested to me that I can't claim a 
property applying to a specific individual is a fact, with the 
example "Fred's illness is more debilitating than George's". I agree, 
but would content 'illness' here is neither a fact nor a quality, but 
a state (i.e. an event); and if this was a non-stative event, like 
running (Fred's running is more debilitating than George's), we 
wouldn't even think this involved a quality.

But then I tried to render the statement in Lojban, and I wonder if 
I've gotten myself in knots:

lenu la fred. bilma cu zmadu lenu la djordj. bilma kei
leka ce'u rinka leka zo'e ruble

That's the version I'm putting in the lesson. But of course, the 
value of zo'e is dependent on ce'u: it's the person who is ill. Does 
it make sense to say

lenu la fred. bilma cu zmadu lenu la djordj. bilma kei
leka ce'u rinka leka ce'u ruble?

Is this instead one of the instances of {makau} I've heard of?

lenu la fred. bilma cu zmadu lenu la djordj. bilma kei
leka ce'u rinka leka makau ruble?

Do we go clever and say

lenu la fred. bilma cu zmadu lenu la djordj. bilma kei
leka ce'uxipa goi tu'a ce'uxire rinka leka ce'uxire ruble?

... or what?
--
+++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++
Dr Nick Nicholas. The Nonce and Future  Henry Squirrel was thirsty. He
Linguist. University of Melbourne.      walked over to the river bank
opoudjis@optushome.com.au               where his good friend Bill Bird
nickn@unimelb.edu.au                    was sitting. Henry slipped and
http://www.opoudjis.net                 fell in the river. Gravity drowned.
        ---  TALE-SPIN Story Generator, James Meehan, Yale AI Lab, 1975.