[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]

Re: [lojban] casnu bau la lojban le si'o selma'o

To: lojban@yahoogroups.com
Subject: Re: [lojban] casnu bau la lojban le si'o selma'o
From: "Shane J. H. Sniffen" <sjhs@sdf.lonestar.org>
Date: Tue, 4 Jun 2002 19:47:33 +0000
In-reply-to: <20020604101802.A12795@allusion.net>; from fracture@allusion.net on Tue, Jun 04, 2002 at 10:18:02AM -0500
References: <20020604004335.A1703@barsoom.net> <LPBBLNNHBOGBGAINBIEFOEFMCIAA.raganok@intrex.net> <20020604101802.A12795@allusion.net>
User-agent: Mutt/1.2.5.1i

On Tue, Jun 04, 2002 at 10:18:02AM -0500, Jordan DeLong wrote:
> 'le selma'o be zo ui', or 'ro lo cmavo be la'e zo ui' seem nicer than
> reverting to using names or descriptions to me.

Why wouldn't "la'o ly. UI .ly" work best in this case? That's
basically what "la'e zo ui" is, except what your quoting is not
actually the lojban word ".ui" but the concept designated by the name
"UI".

Follow-Ups:
- Re: [lojban] casnu bau la lojban le si'o selma'o
  - From: Pierre Abbat <phma@webjockey.net>

References:
- casnu bau la lojban le si'o selma'o
  - From: the Edward Blevins <thedward@barsoom.net>
- RE: [lojban] casnu bau la lojban le si'o selma'o
  - From: "Craig" <ragnarok@pobox.com>
- Re: [lojban] casnu bau la lojban le si'o selma'o
  - From: Jordan DeLong <fracture@allusion.net>

Prev by Date: Re: [lojban] casnu bau la lojban le si'o selma'o
Next by Date: plz help: font converter
Previous by thread: Re: [lojban] casnu bau la lojban le si'o selma'o
Next by thread: Re: [lojban] casnu bau la lojban le si'o selma'o
Index(es):
- Date
- Thread