[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]

[lojban] Re: mi'e


> It was parsed by jbofi'e, but with wrong semantics. Of course,
> {nu facki} needs {le} in front of it! And it seems {segugdrkoria}
> is not recognized as I intended... Should I say {selgugdrkoria},
> using lujvo {selgugde}?

why using selgugde?

When type 2/3 fu'ivla are constructed, the main idea is to have them
preceded with a semantical category. so gugdrkoria
>
> mi'e sanxiyn.