[lojban] Re: Alternative Orthography. Yes, another one.

[Pierre Abbat <phma@webjockey.net>]

On Saturday 17 May 2003 00:21, Robin Lee Powell wrote:
> On Fri, May 16, 2003 at 07:56:34PM -0700, Jon MacLeod wrote:
> >  I think using underlines would work, except in such cases where
> >  that isn't possible. For example, 'juliet.' for 'JUliet.'.
>
> Uhh, that's underlined?
>
> Sure isn't on my PuTTY terminal.

PuTTY terminal? I'm using Kmail in X and it's not underlined.
<check message source>
The message is multipart/alternative. This means that the recipient can choose 
which alternative to display. I have KMail set up to display the text 
alternative, which does not have the underline, because I don't want to be 
susceptible to lo me HTML miptinytci .a lo samvidru bebau la djAvaskript 
.azo'e.

mu'omi'e pier.

-- 
.i toljundi do .ibabo mi'afra tu'a do
.ibabo damba do .ibabo do jinga
.icu'u la ma'atman.