[lojban] Re: Original orthography draft now online for critique

["LakMeer Kravid" <lakmeerkravid@gmail.com>]

On Mon, Apr 7, 2008 at 8:26 AM, Jon Top Hat Jones <eyeonus@gmail.com> wrote:
> I don't like the 's' at all, it's too easy to miss that it's even there.
Addessed in v2, to be uploaded later today. It is now a wavey thing,
resembling one period of a sine wave. This leaves the 'blank line'
character available, which could be handy.

> I don't like p/b, ... I feel that the character ... without the top loop would be better.
> I'd like a less convoluted f/v, as well, but it's no big deal to me.
Noted.

> I like the idea of pre/post stops, but there's the difficulty of things like
> {la .djan.djonz.}: would the internal '.' be pre- or post-?
I imagined it as a post. A {.} is a {.} in Lojban, but purely from a
stylistic angle, I think if you're writing a {.} after some empty
space, use the pre, all others use the post. I'll use your name as an
example when I write up the copy for version 2 so you can see it :)
Thanks for your input.
mu'o mi'e lakmir.


To unsubscribe from this list, send mail to lojban-list-request@lojban.org
with the subject unsubscribe, or go to http://www.lojban.org/lsg2/, or if
you're really stuck, send mail to secretary@lojban.org for help.