[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]
[lojban] Re: vorme
- To: lojban-list@lojban.org
- Subject: [lojban] Re: vorme
- From: "Jorge Llambías" <jjllambias@gmail.com>
- Date: Sun, 29 Jun 2008 11:10:00 -0300
- Dkim-signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=gmail.com; s=gamma; h=domainkey-signature:received:received:message-id:date:from:to :subject:in-reply-to:mime-version:content-type :content-transfer-encoding:content-disposition:references; bh=sZbEues/lQ9V8GbrHujQwBvSM1Ycjsm1cxkYJxqlSRw=; b=VdIJU8T0kj8hDVsFrlGAtMeUqcg8hebn+gziUK1Vtp21N37MASpAxBeoLC+EpYI0ZB XjDMctU+Idj1reBrIe+1ku+zDV4Zi1Ty3eF2O8NbCeF1jnzBezLDn1NAaUu1Acxi2c/9 TWLtmfsLUtgUc8nQLt3u79Z1SxtoeqCxPxgDc=
- Domainkey-signature: a=rsa-sha1; c=nofws; d=gmail.com; s=gamma; h=message-id:date:from:to:subject:in-reply-to:mime-version :content-type:content-transfer-encoding:content-disposition :references; b=pZ1ovOLeijsiiUDY+ksyORZ03JZLy12Z5HVcrR7E0UANpeUlA9swx3c8Wpm4CP0U7S /eWuDbr1IaRkVJtBAIwAJF2HQsbd6iPjXjvNJEkH6X0NYQqNNQ2QBcz9hm11FjCM25AV 3mvH0BiH1a/i1dI/T5jNsrCV8ACmN3ra+eLB4=
- In-reply-to: <737b61f30806282247gc923b9em1e0e11b4a0073abc@mail.gmail.com>
- References: <737b61f30806282247gc923b9em1e0e11b4a0073abc@mail.gmail.com>
- Reply-to: lojban-list@lojban.org
- Sender: lojban-list-bounce@lojban.org
On Sun, Jun 29, 2008 at 2:47 AM, Chris Capel <pdf23ds@gmail.com> wrote:
> In alice, there's this use of vorme:
>
> i abu cidni sanli gi'e catlu le se vorme noi traji le ka melbi kei lei
> purdi poi su'oroi se viska
>
> Now, I'm wondering here whether {te vorme} wouldn't be better. I know
> the official gismu definition doesn't specify that x2 is *this* side,
> and x3 *that* side, but it seems like that's the way it should be, and
> that the sentence would be clearer with {te vorme}. Is that the way
> the x2 and x3 are usually used?
The usual order in gismu with "to" and "from" places is "to x2, from x3",
so I would take {le se vorme} as the place the door leads to, if order
is to be significant. To specify "this" or "that" we can add "vi" or "vu"
(not "va" in this case since there is nobody there being spoken to).
mu'o mi'e xorxes
To unsubscribe from this list, send mail to lojban-list-request@lojban.org
with the subject unsubscribe, or go to http://www.lojban.org/lsg2/, or if
you're really stuck, send mail to secretary@lojban.org for help.