[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]
[lojban] Re: experimental cmavo in lojgloss.
- To: lojban-list@lojban.org
- Subject: [lojban] Re: experimental cmavo in lojgloss.
- From: "Jorge Llambías" <jjllambias@gmail.com>
- Date: Mon, 3 Nov 2008 09:16:12 -0300
- Dkim-signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=gmail.com; s=gamma; h=domainkey-signature:received:received:message-id:date:from:to :subject:in-reply-to:mime-version:content-type :content-transfer-encoding:content-disposition:references; bh=eFVMBDBJKcnPZywoBFjcDddQg57F8ECa1jsmR8b+rlA=; b=SUTHHP+vIarFcCy80GDxYCdnaohKxD37/Kdq5L6lyOfJ0c/SZ7gFLMF5dypkyyoSzd y3yyRiduy98KuLd+0L6X7ZntFw/y2u1a0nryxfiptB7aqRvFvfpIAkxECmegxcxVHtfh 70AnQzd/ExEKgzkHZOKhYo53S8siRYI2uziRQ=
- Domainkey-signature: a=rsa-sha1; c=nofws; d=gmail.com; s=gamma; h=message-id:date:from:to:subject:in-reply-to:mime-version :content-type:content-transfer-encoding:content-disposition :references; b=eHBS4dokpcMcC67vU14BaUHulCFHMb/tsHuKc0xlV4swsF2aF2jxLb66ozqqbASyHi eXgtdKlpirhejsrnu0RD0bGMYAKmu/JRFg2PAlRDKil4/jskP46tk6xl0uZA0qXF/zPM ksUzjnHLs+vUBnBGlIpWHUeYVCaraNuuHsfi0=
- In-reply-to: <737b61f30811022128n9e8692evefaa820062d2a652@mail.gmail.com>
- References: <737b61f30811022128n9e8692evefaa820062d2a652@mail.gmail.com>
- Reply-to: lojban-list@lojban.org
- Sender: lojban-list-bounce@lojban.org
On Mon, Nov 3, 2008 at 2:28 AM, Chris Capel <pdf23ds@gmail.com> wrote:
> I'm wondering how to handle experimental cmavo in Lojgloss. As I see
> it, they probably fall into at least two catogories.
>
> 1) Drops right into an existing selma'o, like BAI.
> 2) Constitutes its own selma'o.
>
> 1 could be handled pretty straightforwardly without having to change
> the parser code, just using some configuration. But 2 would probably
> be more difficult to handle. At the extreme it would require changing
> the grammar and recompiling the parser. It'd be nice to avoid that. So
> how common is case 2?
The only example of 2 that comes to mind is zo'oi/la'oi, of selma'o ZOhOI.
The rules for selmaho ZOhOI should be just like those for ZO, except
"any-word" is replaced by something similar to "zoi-word".
In general, introducing a new selmaho is a bad idea, unless very
explicit rules are given for it.
mu'o mi'e xorxes
To unsubscribe from this list, send mail to lojban-list-request@lojban.org
with the subject unsubscribe, or go to http://www.lojban.org/lsg2/, or if
you're really stuck, send mail to secretary@lojban.org for help.