On Mon, Nov 10, 2008 at 4:28 PM, Pierre Abbat
<phma@phma.optus.nu> wrote:
On Monday 10 November 2008 13:50:47 komfo,amonan wrote:
> Smallish point: Is there any reason not to merge < gismu >, < lujvo >, and
> < fu'ivla > into < brivla >? The distinctions between those three seem not
> relevant to the stated purpose. { le do .arxokuna cu barkla di'u } works
> just as well, right?
arxokuna ki'a? .i lumge'u java'i prokiono xu?
go'i .i mi ca lo nu djica lo nu fanva cu pu facki fi no valsi be fi la lojban .i zvati pe'a la jbovlaste ji lo drata
mu'o mi'e komfo,amonan