[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]
[lojban] Re: Annotated PEG grammar
- To: lojban-list@lojban.org
- Subject: [lojban] Re: Annotated PEG grammar
- From: "Jorge Llambías" <jjllambias@gmail.com>
- Date: Sun, 16 Nov 2008 17:12:53 -0300
- Dkim-signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=gmail.com; s=gamma; h=domainkey-signature:received:received:message-id:date:from:to :subject:in-reply-to:mime-version:content-type :content-transfer-encoding:content-disposition:references; bh=LI+evniM9UoDaXyAWnUKDVBJuDDAbWUPNDeC/VD2axg=; b=JW+y4vAZl0491bQW5tKoyDn2oqfmhj1TiPI3oY8BRUAsbP1DdA9FQW4oXzqbew1xzT gqyf00caZsbtY+4oe9hB1xKlqqDAvKtt3vg9tF+unZtZwPzxSnQLwyfdVn8FMgNQXzhC QJo7bxWeX3aqa85X8w+zbCOINz2vcD4OhTnKM=
- Domainkey-signature: a=rsa-sha1; c=nofws; d=gmail.com; s=gamma; h=message-id:date:from:to:subject:in-reply-to:mime-version :content-type:content-transfer-encoding:content-disposition :references; b=tVYpIrkxCMmGefR8bGqr7Yod58BZ8fcHufbdVfgXckaOaevKZNYVUEDIjanwu9byot EZq/Gb+iiBPVbuXRDjuk0ioXWLfoSR+aN7SsGO4pB3qqSOeaaTB281YZg3bgc+bVMGn4 pWYxH5PQpkEKh+9oo6n0+In818t0l3V30b1nU=
- In-reply-to: <737b61f30811151245n352f23dala9685c894d991550@mail.gmail.com>
- References: <737b61f30811151245n352f23dala9685c894d991550@mail.gmail.com>
- Reply-to: lojban-list@lojban.org
- Sender: lojban-list-bounce@lojban.org
>> gek-sentence <- gek subsentence gik subsentence tail-terms / tag? KE free* gek-sentence KEhE? free* / NA free* gek-sentence
>> This production refers to the already-defined production subsentence above. The options handle KE and NA prefixes.
Perhaps point out why KE is used here at all. It's not needed to do
any grouping, since gek already handles that by itself. I think the
only reason is to separate "tag" from a possibe gek of form "tag GI"
since otherwise "tag tag" could collapse into a single tag.
>> sumti-4 <- sumti-5 / gek sumti gik sumti-4
>>
>>This references itself instead of 'sumti' so that joik-eks get associated with the whole gek-gik phrase instead of just the sumti after the gik.
A very unfortunate and confusing choice. gek .. gik ... should allow
the same things for each connectand.
mu'o mi'e xorxes
To unsubscribe from this list, send mail to lojban-list-request@lojban.org
with the subject unsubscribe, or go to http://www.lojban.org/lsg2/, or if
you're really stuck, send mail to secretary@lojban.org for help.