[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]
[lojban] Re: Superfluous {tosmabru} check?
- To: lojban-list@lojban.org
- Subject: [lojban] Re: Superfluous {tosmabru} check?
- From: "Jorge Llambías" <jjllambias@gmail.com>
- Date: Wed, 26 Nov 2008 20:41:58 -0300
- Dkim-signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=gmail.com; s=gamma; h=domainkey-signature:received:received:message-id:date:from:to :subject:in-reply-to:mime-version:content-type :content-transfer-encoding:content-disposition:references; bh=HEsq9suZ3ftCw84ZiR3HarGUcsDGraNfU5Zw4dH1IrQ=; b=AR3FwsbVDRnwOVTk4DD/M+ZBkTRGmeCV12CISEZMPMLMYtcbDGzk7auZnWPmruk1Ty WDPAiyMvU6ZXNts/+sZgLI4zHTTXHvzRnmMWZbIQNQvwoFp4jlHZ7cpx4VumRIziZrDE tf1e20yMUrhmCceErFF6QQSAPQHiqmi35vaZA=
- Domainkey-signature: a=rsa-sha1; c=nofws; d=gmail.com; s=gamma; h=message-id:date:from:to:subject:in-reply-to:mime-version :content-type:content-transfer-encoding:content-disposition :references; b=kkypYw9dOi9+lAr338EKkizx78R/t1hfqg4fM3br9KLKKuJsNQfpEKD80yibeO7kc/ 4t3uVZ8F50fu2tUI/RK5TGIWCMiewEtH+vg5nOarKd4OcoyPF67jlsRcQR+41xFRbhJy on3RI8hBa3qt+p4NJOfur3aZ4IcfJzf+yORCA=
- In-reply-to: <20081126231234.GA21340@sdf.lonestar.org>
- References: <20081126231234.GA21340@sdf.lonestar.org>
- Reply-to: lojban-list@lojban.org
- Sender: lojban-list-bounce@lojban.org
On Wed, Nov 26, 2008 at 8:12 PM, Minimiscience <minimiscience@gmail.com> wrote:
> Thus, the {tosmabru} test will always
> indicate that a {lujvo} of the form "(CVC)* + 'y' + X" does not need any
> further hyphens, and so applying the test to such a {lujvo} in the first place
> is completely pointless. Is this true, or am I missing something very basic?
Consider bab+lab+bla: bablabybla = ba blabybla
mu'o mi'e xorxes
To unsubscribe from this list, send mail to lojban-list-request@lojban.org
with the subject unsubscribe, or go to http://www.lojban.org/lsg2/, or if
you're really stuck, send mail to secretary@lojban.org for help.