[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]
[lojban] Re: [lojban-beginners] Re: About the negators
- To: lojban-list@lojban.org
- Subject: [lojban] Re: [lojban-beginners] Re: About the negators
- From: John E Clifford <kali9putra@yahoo.com>
- Date: Wed, 17 Dec 2008 08:53:35 -0800 (PST)
- Domainkey-signature: a=rsa-sha1; q=dns; c=nofws; s=s1024; d=yahoo.com; h=X-YMail-OSG:Received:X-Mailer:Date:From:Subject:To:MIME-Version:Content-Type:Content-Transfer-Encoding:Message-ID; b=qPapt3aH394WDrmeAhIyh3kCKQ1J8Ml30o0oGrJHNesSqMEtz31mOee+LBfdzOlLUR7eZi7YsMLLVVaqA0czr/C57G6d1pJWf1B+v+3j4J3ljly9dgfou/ScYcHwHsdbYabtnUglNhMQ54+9K8KsM/t5WHujXinRf6ZPrcdh9iQ=;
- Reply-to: lojban-list@lojban.org
- Sender: lojban-list-bounce@lojban.org
The claim to be spoken predicate logic has always been a bit of a Loglan/Lojban joke, second only perhaps to the claim to be a tool for testing the Sapir-Whorf hypothesis.The lack of clear usable scope rules -- right hand end problems -- is only one of many deviations, trivial and major. Most of the deviances are said to arise from the demands of actual languages in use. This is a questionable claim, but, if true, could bre accomodated in many other ways than the current versions (some maybe even simpler or more usable), Since scope is not -- in Lojban -- a syntactic category, the problems here do not affect the claim or unambiguousness, but do create other sorts of ambiguity.
----- Original Message ----
From: Jorge Llambías <jjllambias@gmail.com>
To: lojban-list@lojban.org
Sent: Wednesday, December 17, 2008 7:21:17 AM
Subject: [lojban] Re: [lojban-beginners] Re: About the negators
On Wed, Dec 17, 2008 at 9:55 AM, Michael Turniansky
<mturniansky@gmail.com> wrote:
>
> I suggest this conversation has now grown well beyond the limits of
> lojban-beginners list.
(I am responding in lojban-list.)
> Suffice it to say that while the use of na is
> well-defined in simple bridi, its meaning in very complicated sentence with
> both existential qualifiers and bridi tails is not well-defined.
If {su'o da na broda gi'e brode} counts as a "very complicated
sentence", then the characterization of Lojban as "spoken predicate
logic" is almost a sham. The relative scopes of quantifiers, logical
connectives and negation should be very straightforward.
mu'o mi'e xorxes
To unsubscribe from this list, send mail to lojban-list-request@lojban.org
with the subject unsubscribe, or go to http://www.lojban.org/lsg2/, or if
you're really stuck, send mail to secretary@lojban.org for help.
To unsubscribe from this list, send mail to lojban-list-request@lojban.org
with the subject unsubscribe, or go to http://www.lojban.org/lsg2/, or if
you're really stuck, send mail to secretary@lojban.org for help.