[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]

[lojban] Re: more problems with ni'o



On Thu, Dec 18, 2008 at 11:51 PM, Chris Capel <pdf23ds@gmail.com> wrote:
> {ni'o ta'o coi py} parses
> {ta'o coi py i broda} parses
> {ni'o ta'o coi py i broda} does not parse.
>
> I propose
>
> text-part-2 <- (CMENE-clause+ / indicators?) free*
>
> change to
>
> text-part-2 <- NIhO-clause* (CMENE-clause+ / indicators?) free*

That still leaves {ni'o ta'o coi py i broda ni'o ta'o co'o py .i brode} out.

I think a better fix might be to make the empty sentence one of the
options of "fragment", instead of having it at the text-1 level.

mu'o mi'e xorxes


To unsubscribe from this list, send mail to lojban-list-request@lojban.org
with the subject unsubscribe, or go to http://www.lojban.org/lsg2/, or if
you're really stuck, send mail to secretary@lojban.org for help.