[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]
[lojban] Gender neutrality?
- To: lojban-list <lojban-list@lojban.org>
- Subject: [lojban] Gender neutrality?
- From: Danny Piccirillo <danny.piccirillo@gmail.com>
- Date: Mon, 20 Apr 2009 01:33:36 -0400
- Dkim-signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=gmail.com; s=gamma; h=domainkey-signature:mime-version:received:from:date:message-id :subject:to:content-type; bh=GjhCLnDLuHE8LAd9WNtrtb3nIyr7xGPJWzD5vsKi2g8=; b=jxdXJxHmA7AP1vS6UUy68INrGUVY42o6rbigxoA4G83XJRQFQNYRTC6AFCom6e3VC8 QQXFyFgaJ8KoM3DIXcN+7nd3nRQEmI/dyEgD14zE2fhf4rYxpVcDEEtW6DFC+qC7UASg Tu5PZqzDms5WOU/pzmrsxujTJObpekM18p08g=
- Domainkey-signature: a=rsa-sha1; c=nofws; d=gmail.com; s=gamma; h=mime-version:from:date:message-id:subject:to:content-type; b=I5waelHtbJrLK3a12wS46BauvqUJOEMwZ/ZL9n7rUNgNia4HaFU6zergXdnbwzHzUL uisU08ktoTR8ynUT2CzSN2jKpWgimzHwa8iweploNeU0Q+JltDLbKS694LX573qzuKiN InbieR4GZKmVYjEi/xDRWeI4gAvJtdk7I5+gA=
- Reply-to: lojban-list@lojban.org
- Sender: lojban-list-bounce@lojban.org
Still a n00b, so i'm just looking for some clarification on this. One of the many many reasons lojban appeals to me, is that it is supposed to be gender neutral, but one thing still bothers me. If there are terms for boy, man, girl, and woman, there are surely terms for one who identifies as masculine or feminine, or androgynous, genderqueer, etc and those are the terms i think should be preferred in common conversation when talking about someone who has a gender identity (all humans). Is this do-able~ an idea the can be spread to all lojbanists?