[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]
[lojban] Re: be, bei?
- To: lojban-list@lojban.org
- Subject: [lojban] Re: be, bei?
- From: Michael Turniansky <mturniansky@gmail.com>
- Date: Tue, 7 Jul 2009 22:28:18 -0400
- Dkim-signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=gmail.com; s=gamma; h=domainkey-signature:mime-version:received:in-reply-to:references :date:message-id:subject:from:to:content-type :content-transfer-encoding; bh=0qqfWaRLNVfe552UIwOJtyTXi4IcI7rIV+YXMTLV6Eg=; b=x0cp2akUhTZdWGsh8tQu7DYgTwjBNkEkmWrS2ba03lu1U1skQUcSvFpvccSWgPXuwq kmkr9z3BqyJmPgR9/NO7xgkv8/U2HjbkOxlNlOFF/WPCoxjHkvi5zuIHJL98CSgKTXGA 2UZPZA+egq+QOP4+QSogyuREyWvJ9BEY4bSDE=
- Domainkey-signature: a=rsa-sha1; c=nofws; d=gmail.com; s=gamma; h=mime-version:in-reply-to:references:date:message-id:subject:from:to :content-type:content-transfer-encoding; b=egfGE1JTq8M2vlg8fgXLASPrtOUhHRUfh+jUFqQVI/+1D58HSSfx/ebVqK7HHF5aew n4N5Xo+aDGtUDojHpNUXGX5lIYaJu/YXlLFgsizI6KPkgMB40vScn9np0ANOJRiPO14x 2ufYdGSzF1Yl4V8J9DfCdwYY6TnAEqXV0ovwo=
- In-reply-to: <737b61f30907071923k3fce033chbd8b0aaa6617341f@mail.gmail.com>
- References: <737b61f30907071923k3fce033chbd8b0aaa6617341f@mail.gmail.com>
- Reply-to: lojban-list@lojban.org
- Sender: lojban-list-bounce@lojban.org
On Tue, Jul 7, 2009 at 10:23 PM, Chris Capel<pdf23ds@gmail.com> wrote:
> Why is bei grammatically necessary? Why not make {broda lo brode be la
> alis. la djan be'o} legal?
>
> Chris Capel
Well, I guess you could, but then be'o would basically never be
elidable except at the end of an utterance
--gejyspa
To unsubscribe from this list, send mail to lojban-list-request@lojban.org
with the subject unsubscribe, or go to http://www.lojban.org/lsg2/, or if
you're really stuck, send mail to secretary@lojban.org for help.