[lojban] Re: Philosophical differences.

[Arnt Richard Johansen <arj@nvg.org>]

On Mon, Jul 20, 2009 at 05:46:55AM -0700, Lindar Greenwood wrote:
> I would like to express my issues with a few words, and I welcome
> responses which include either supporting statements or reasons (other
> than the ones previously mentioned) why I may just be
> confused/misguided/wrong/misunderstanding things/etc.

The overarching reason why I think neither the BPFK nor the wider Lojban community needs to worry about this is that the language is designed to be extensible. It is impossible to specify everything a person could ever want to talk about, so we provide the possibility of building new words, lujvo and fu'ivla, exactly like natural languages do.

> [...] We have plibu, ganti, and pinji, which are all
> non-gender-specific until we make a lujvo/tanru out of them, so we
> ought to be consistent.

As for consistency in gismu space: consistent with what? To paraphrase Borges, we can't agree on how the universe is structured, so we have no hope of coming up with a semantic system that has no room for improvement.

"But," I can hear you shouting, "why not make *these* few changes? They're necessary!" Well, there we come to the issue that you didn't want to talk about, namely stability and the inviolable baseline. Bear with me for a moment ...

Lojban exists because people wanted a Loglan that they could speak. People who are investing effort in learning something, anything, hate it when you change things so that what they learnt is no longer valid. The Loglan Institute's ready willingness to change the language out from under learners' feet is legendary in these circles. So we have always been very strongly motivated to not change the language if we could possibly help it.

Now this is, of course, the perspective of somewhat of an oldtimer. (I started learning Lojban after the CLL was published.) I would be greatly upset by having to re-learn the language, but I know that some people that have been along for longer than I speak very good Lojban, even though they learned the TLI version first. So it's possible to learn both versions.

I wonder what the opinion of the millennial Lojbanists are on stability? (If you first heard of Lojban after 2002, I'm talking to you.) Do you personally consider it important?

-- 
Arnt Richard Johansen                                http://arj.nvg.org/
I owe, I owe - so off to work I go.


To unsubscribe from this list, send mail to lojban-list-request@lojban.org
with the subject unsubscribe, or go to http://www.lojban.org/lsg2/, or if
you're really stuck, send mail to secretary@lojban.org for help.