[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]
[lojban] Re: Philosophical differences.
On Tue, Jul 28, 2009 at 1:12 PM, John E Clifford<kali9putra@yahoo.com> wrote:
>
> The second point is that, if Lojban is unparsable (and your assurances
> in the face of failing parsers is not comforting), it loses its main raison d'etre.
I don't think stela said Lojban was unparsable, he just said that the
actual parser implementations are not perfect. As far as I know,
camxes is practically in complete agreement with the official
specification, and where it deviates it does so on purpose. jbofi'e
has some known unintentional bugs. There are various proposals for
simplifying the official specification in a few respects, but
obviously not to change the specification to make the language
unparsable, just to change it to something simpler (I'm thinking for
example of the grammar of compound tags).
mu'o mi'e xorxes
To unsubscribe from this list, send mail to lojban-list-request@lojban.org
with the subject unsubscribe, or go to http://www.lojban.org/lsg2/, or if
you're really stuck, send mail to secretary@lojban.org for help.