[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]
[lojban] Re: Logical connectives
- To: lojban-list@lojban.org
- Subject: [lojban] Re: Logical connectives
- From: Jorge Llambías <jjllambias@gmail.com>
- Date: Fri, 11 Sep 2009 12:20:19 -0300
- Dkim-signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=gmail.com; s=gamma; h=domainkey-signature:mime-version:received:in-reply-to:references :date:message-id:subject:from:to:content-type :content-transfer-encoding; bh=8wcmt9yHonmcuniY2952K9PL35GD9MuAQoK7NGQNpks=; b=a/2D5oo6O5VaiXiKIXcRfkp14uJg07YQ0ogp2PhoMkkuaBn8j+d0P8mnBWUUEdqBqN Yc8/GFbmKdcmcyzQAwlT5baq9ZPwXyPnXlMoClsrehhZDGlQJKa2doUrO2AoJXqWH0Ff 9pu3acOYVb2gGR+R6HffUA5Gt5HClzuVEBrbg=
- Domainkey-signature: a=rsa-sha1; c=nofws; d=gmail.com; s=gamma; h=mime-version:in-reply-to:references:date:message-id:subject:from:to :content-type:content-transfer-encoding; b=aS3b3TflcgjYI1auRok1fKMcHFEJWtJWZD1AIsYkCuxuVqmAOd5wBSd/YhD5LyIdAP 5gTdR5ru0cl1xlga4VA36746V0EvOspKWCmWkruc4+8CcD+V21WFF2gHc/Cvt/GkgR8x Q1XauQLchB+Q/VnfKyy4zduQCAMnRk5TBwVxw=
- In-reply-to: <23298cb40909110800j528aa090y2af41a204bbd7e13@mail.gmail.com>
- References: <23298cb40909110800j528aa090y2af41a204bbd7e13@mail.gmail.com>
- Reply-to: lojban-list@lojban.org
- Sender: lojban-list-bounce@lojban.org
On Fri, Sep 11, 2009 at 12:00 PM, Remo Dentato <rdentato@gmail.com> wrote:
>
> Is it correct to say that when using logical connectives like in: {mi
> cutka ti .a ta} , {ti .a ta} is a single sumti?
>From a grammatical (syntactical) point of view, the connected
construction functions as a single sumti, yes.
>From a logical point of view, they are two sumti. "mi citka ti .a ta"
is logically equivalent to "mi citka ti .ija mi citka ta". This
differs from the "non-logical" sumti connectives, for which the syntax
does match the logical structure.
> Also, if I had abstractions {le nu ... kei .e le nu ... kei .e le nu
> ... kei} are the {kei} elidable?
It depends on what the "..." is. Sometimes kei will be elidable, sometimes not.
mu'o mi'e xorxes
To unsubscribe from this list, send mail to lojban-list-request@lojban.org
with the subject unsubscribe, or go to http://www.lojban.org/lsg2/, or if
you're really stuck, send mail to secretary@lojban.org for help.