Stela Selckiku wrote: > Hmm, well here is how I think of it: There are an infinite number of > da/de/di/ko'a/fo'a/etc available, because you can use anything as a > subscript. It would be really interesting to subscript da with no'o, su'o or du'e :) mu'o mi'e timos
Attachment:
signature.asc
Description: OpenPGP digital signature