[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]
[lojban] Re: lojban typography
- To: lojban-list@lojban.org
- Subject: [lojban] Re: lojban typography
- From: Remo Dentato <rdentato@gmail.com>
- Date: Thu, 22 Oct 2009 17:26:40 +0200
- Dkim-signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=gmail.com; s=gamma; h=domainkey-signature:mime-version:received:in-reply-to:references :date:message-id:subject:from:to:content-type :content-transfer-encoding; bh=mqZ76pGgAGn2b+1opqV51d0J/AJrTlaRzcOJCfcz26Y=; b=KySog+JNuujHRHXU4GLBguK1srf81A95osEnOIQtMnVLKfZ9Na8mWQnzeFt8UZDQI/ BW/hqHNskmIqi85ljQwkOBXuuqz/uejIcWerm4Atea56PO4+CD66lQP12Krk8ypBwjho 03Ipd1hDN+0FgtKhj5kPyzf+UONOgXkR09xzM=
- Domainkey-signature: a=rsa-sha1; c=nofws; d=gmail.com; s=gamma; h=mime-version:in-reply-to:references:date:message-id:subject:from:to :content-type:content-transfer-encoding; b=Qc6atzfgS4w4V0bEuKT1du0CyBcmyjlfZfhoCuXdSAsrZraGt1GaEmh2Ebp9cjsxsk c/IrQrCVoqe+Ea5WQt4zb6ef7/x5QGHQXPbguOtV0y1rjL1nc5r8FeJpJT9FEiX8wjO7 rZ7KexTPcdOx5tVVtBw6cOJIJCvJ1lawgixhc=
- In-reply-to: <CB971D8E-206B-4347-AE09-5B4C3818C717@mac.com>
- References: <23298cb40910220553l7b1e579fqe7218b95708fe41e@mail.gmail.com> <CB971D8E-206B-4347-AE09-5B4C3818C717@mac.com>
- Reply-to: lojban-list@lojban.org
- Sender: lojban-list-bounce@lojban.org
On Thu, Oct 22, 2009 at 3:13 PM, Kevin Reid <kpreid@mac.com> wrote:
> On Oct 22, 2009, at 8:53, Remo Dentato wrote:
>
>> - the dot of {.i} is enlarged by x% or rendered in bold
>
>
> I think this is not a good choice. Firstly, "i" is the separator word; the
> dot is is incidental. Secondly, having emphasized separators would produce
> visual noise which would distract from the rest of the text. If anything,
> ".i" should be lightly deemphasized, made slightly more like a piece of
> whitespace.
Well, the point is to create visual clues for the eye.
When I try to understand a lojban sentence (possibly three lines long
as there are some in the PDF:
http://sites.google.com/site/jboremod/cll/lonubinxo.pdf) I scan it
multiple times with the eyes to identify the bridi, the sumti etc. I
needed something to help me immediately identify when I could stop
scanning. I've tried to add a lot of space around {,i}, to bold it,
to make it larger, to make it smaller etc. In the end I opted for
enlarging.
I speak for myself here, of course, my intent is exactly to determine
what good typography rules could be for lojban.
To unsubscribe from this list, send mail to lojban-list-request@lojban.org
with the subject unsubscribe, or go to http://www.lojban.org/lsg2/, or if
you're really stuck, send mail to secretary@lojban.org for help.