Perhaps a liturgical language with a long history qualifies as well as languages with native speakers.
On Fri, Nov 27, 2009 at 5:10 PM, Pierre Abbat
<phma@phma.optus.nu> wrote:
On Friday 27 November 2009 14:21:34 Stela Selckiku wrote:
> That'd be great, if we can get added... but usually it's a struggle
> for us (or Klingon, or Toki Pona) to get in, even to those places that
> have Esperanto. (I can't say that's necessarily unfair-- we're not
> really in E-o's league, population-wise.)
It looks like a language has to have native speakers to be included, though I
see two exceptions, Latin (which may have some current native speakers) and
Slavic (there are several Slavic languages listed, so maybe they mean OCS?).
So maybe ca le nu lo verclijbo cu makcu kei ba jmina.
mu'omi'e .pier.
--
.i toljundi do .ibabo mi'afra tu'a do
.ibabo damba do .ibabo do jinga
.icu'u la ma'atman.