[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]
Re: [lojban] Re: bancu, bandu and bangu
- To: lojban-list@lojban.org
- Subject: Re: [lojban] Re: bancu, bandu and bangu
- From: Cyril Slobin <cyril@slobin.pp.ru>
- Date: Thu, 3 Dec 2009 03:21:49 +0300
- Dkim-signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=gmail.com; s=gamma; h=domainkey-signature:mime-version:sender:received:in-reply-to :references:date:x-google-sender-auth:message-id:subject:from:to :content-type; bh=VjkFDN95rqiMgB1xz2rdau0JaOzFAIlyTD/SHMFIzUs=; b=Gy6SarvL5E8ThLxft1QGPsBZJerwkURrDdbHgpgT3Ws3SCpf8+9iXBR//dmbvpLJDa qaDgVoYE3sTbpH5dWptC8RNlxuBATx8AueZqznbabPffWnlRtWBpSULYi8pm+AR/xVs0 l+4R+OfHuR6uPt1k4rq+xF8nd7DL6QkNb+mCM=
- Domainkey-signature: a=rsa-sha1; c=nofws; d=gmail.com; s=gamma; h=mime-version:sender:in-reply-to:references:date :x-google-sender-auth:message-id:subject:from:to:content-type; b=gV/IigHcSln22ikTo4z4oiAKndDTCZvfbvcAP0bxNW23zFDympB+t1FmR3snzkyZsd 6B4CfA7tuFCvh119HXnQ4KzAu3Q4EZ41U8TCTQkir5GXVpJ72T3ietaaN2TOvJSQNJXn xSE0KlBDtNWsdChGlIV1V5+sAfeVS97CHxtzY=
- In-reply-to: <20091202235421.GA6236@sdf.lonestar.org>
- References: <3ccac5f10912021534r4086b7caq31eca3c325f8dd4f@mail.gmail.com> <20091202235421.GA6236@sdf.lonestar.org>
- Sender: cyril.slobin@gmail.com
On Thu, Dec 3, 2009 at 2:54 AM, Minimiscience <minimiscience@gmail.com> wrote:
> "{lo bangu cu bancu lo banzu fo loka bandu lo do menli}"
I probably would replace "fo" with "be" (moving "loka ..." form
x4 of "bancu" to x2 of "banzu"), but both seem pragmatically
equivalent.
--
http://slobin.pp.ru/ `When I use a word,' Humpty Dumpty said,
<cyril@slobin.pp.ru> `it means just what I choose it to mean'