[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]
tagged termsets
- To: lojban-list@lojban.org
- Subject: tagged termsets
- From: Michael Turniansky <mturniansky@gmail.com>
- Date: Thu, 17 Dec 2009 10:39:17 -0500
- Dkim-signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=gmail.com; s=gamma; h=domainkey-signature:mime-version:received:date:message-id:subject :from:to:content-type; bh=41p3RhJHbJUKFB+eEoxsK+hMUDE5CU8nTlDBr8nsnr0=; b=mYabDPOmt9BfHb0EeLeWj/CR1W4nnzr4I4CFHaemOS9j+zXagjJ8XTnmyg+CUzRYGC qda2rY6yZ2MWqZjbUlVAGgywSIphrkPonpTNwgWMwZkn+drMsdOChppy3jscHsy/22Tu gy3txTlawLGGKWE11CJgFD8LUJHkkTp4zx07w=
- Domainkey-signature: a=rsa-sha1; c=nofws; d=gmail.com; s=gamma; h=mime-version:date:message-id:subject:from:to:content-type; b=LP4X1ogN7q6gt3pdTTl5sf2jtSsTgU8flMoqGjqnRhh8nYUYikiNLLzp3/HCsjZ5Z8 IpUnmm6Ad6lGzf0LAWgMM4Vi/Mx2C69td4ZdGVWsXHM3kVOPXiouNTZDcgFvf6Jl1sSR YOA6JC2u0NmpHcfxwSAuCqUoyN/ND4axRya/Y=
From the Esther wikiforum, btu received no response:
---
Totus asked about the following at the end of [Esther] chapter 3
ciska tetai piro se mi'esku be la xaMAN. bei ge le turni pe le
nolraitru ge'u .e le viptru vu'o poi turni ro selje'a ku'o gi le nobli
be ro natmi be'o nu'i ge tecu'u ro selje'a sepi'o lo selyle'u pe ri gi
tecu'u ro natmi bau lo bangu be ri
"Shouldn't there be a {nu'u} in front of {gi}? (CLL Chapter 14, example 11..7)"
I wasn't really sure. He may very well be right. Both parse, but I'm
not sure exactly the difference is semantically (and jbofi'e doesn't
handle tagged termsets), so I was wondering if some kind jbocre can
help us out here?
----
So, anyone willing to answer? It came up again,
--gejyspa