[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]
Re: [lojban] Fw: bridi tail negation
- To: lojban-list@lojban.org
- Subject: Re: [lojban] Fw: bridi tail negation
- From: Michael Turniansky <mturniansky@gmail.com>
- Date: Thu, 4 Mar 2010 09:53:35 -0500
- Dkim-signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=gmail.com; s=gamma; h=domainkey-signature:mime-version:received:in-reply-to:references :date:message-id:subject:from:to:content-type :content-transfer-encoding; bh=600bewAnorZvpZBbAspwCUZoKGESe78M0Nh03zcnkYU=; b=g8TkdhBD/qQt1sDKJ1+yDVFBG9yzIL14YQto/8X4rlqzXIcRRQ0p8Hhtt2REvbAW0R JTe17LkcEQbKuwrlbCWcE13QC2PjhZhAoj3u/N7GPmEJ7qHw3qA/PP2ckSE73EIOmvAY Qyr1xpLRwpvNAYrt1Iw/tS0sFdbF5Npcjfcts=
- Domainkey-signature: a=rsa-sha1; c=nofws; d=gmail.com; s=gamma; h=mime-version:in-reply-to:references:date:message-id:subject:from:to :content-type:content-transfer-encoding; b=OW2loalKVxf/wOiwIAegJiEwZfdlyhYknTSwxlRk1dpUtZSKVg7t3oRMf88HBNP7uQ jwiR4iR4gFBoVObEoqnFdDHZdwrDmgFXsFhJ52CDJabe3K8jWjYNkbvDkJq6M/WzWffJ pW43RUmkNgtBo+VNIB3/0czfu2qRzmMrgG6Ys=
- In-reply-to: <395141.17119.qm@web88001.mail.re2.yahoo.com>
- References: <395141.17119.qm@web88001.mail.re2.yahoo.com>
On Thu, Mar 4, 2010 at 9:39 AM, A. PIEKARSKI <totus@rogers.com> wrote:
>
> coi ro do
>
> I asked this question on lojba-beginners btu nobody responded.
> Can someone here please answer it?
>
Actually, you never left this question on lojban-beginners.
> I've just translated
>
> "It wasn't much fun sitting up there in their tree house not speaking.
> "
> as
>
> {.i na'e se zanfri fa lonu zutse ne'i le ricyzda gi'enai tavla}
>
> But suppose I had left it as:
> {.i na'e se zanfri fa lonu zutse ne'i le ricyzda gi'e na tavla}?
>
> Would the negation have covered the whole bridi or just the bridi tail?
>
My belief is that it would also just negate the tail. More
problematic to me is a na in front of the first selbri. The CLL
doesn't unfortunately cover these cases.
--gejyspa