Re: [lojban] negating connectives

[John Cowan <cowan@ccil.org>]

pycyn@aol.com scripsit:

> I'm not sure I follow, since the example doesn't seem to be an example of 
> what I took the general case to be. But to try to deal with the general case 
> first, I suppose that {na'e} would work {p ina'eje q} (I'm not sure the 
> grammar works here) 

It doesn't: that's ungrammatical.

-- 
John Cowan                                   cowan@ccil.org
One art/there is/no less/no more/All things/to do/with sparks/galore
	--Douglas Hofstadter