[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]

Re: [lojban] {lo'i} as a Q-kau solution?

To: Invent Yourself <xod@sixgirls.org>
Subject: Re: [lojban] {lo'i} as a Q-kau solution?
From: John Cowan <cowan@ccil.org>
Date: Mon, 13 Aug 2001 22:55:40 -0400 (EDT)
Cc: lojban@yahoogroups.comk
In-reply-to: <Pine.NEB.4.33.0108131937120.23574-100000@reva.sixgirls.org> from Invent Yourself at "Aug 13, 2001 07:44:06 pm"

Invent Yourself scripsit:

> If the grammar says djuno x2 MUST be a du'u, then djuno lu'e is
> grammatically incorrect.

The grammar does not say that, nor does the gismu list, which says that
a seldjuno is *semantically* a du'u.  For a trivial example,
consider:  mi djuno le seldjuno be do

-- 
John Cowan                                   cowan@ccil.org
One art/there is/no less/no more/All things/to do/with sparks/galore
	--Douglas Hofstadter

References:
- Re: [lojban] {lo'i} as a Q-kau solution?
  - From: Invent Yourself <xod@sixgirls.org>

Prev by Date: Re: [lojban] Second session on Record: anaphora
Next by Date: Re: [lojban] {lo'i} as a Q-kau solution?
Previous by thread: Re: [lojban] {lo'i} as a Q-kau solution?
Next by thread: Re: [lojban] {lo'i} as a Q-kau solution?
Index(es):
- Date
- Thread