RE: [lojban] {lo'i} as a Q-kau solution?

["Jorge Llambias" <jjllambias@hotmail.com>]

la and cusku di'e

> OK. But if we had some way to talk about intensional categories
> (such that the class of goers is not the same thing as {J, P, M}),
> then our problem would be solved.

I think {lo'e} and {le'e} are the intensional gadri.

> How about -- I'm just
> floating this to see how it fares -- replacing {ma kau} with
> {ce'u}? Does this result in gross illogicalities, or in sentences
> which would then have competing interpretations?

Yes. All those that use both ce'u and makau, as in {frica le ka
makau viska ce'u} vs {frica le ka ce'u viska makau}.

mu'o mi'e xorxes





_________________________________________________________________
Get your FREE download of MSN Explorer at http://explorer.msn.com/intl.asp