[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]

Re: [lojban] mo

To: Elrond <grey.havens@earthling.net>
Subject: Re: [lojban] mo
From: John Cowan <cowan@ccil.org>
Date: Sat, 18 Aug 2001 00:04:39 -0400 (EDT)
Cc: lojban@yahoogroups.com
In-reply-to: <20010818051325.74bfa460.grey.havens@earthling.net> from Elrond at "Aug 18, 2001 05:13:25 am"

Elrond scripsit:
> Hi,
> 
> 	I was wondering: since "mo" questions can be replied to using a tanru, I
> believe that the meaning of several "mo" in a row (without "co" on either
> side of the sequence) is the same as the meaning of only one. i.e. that "i
> mo mo" and "i mo" have the same meaning.

I think your arguments are perfectly sound.

-- 
John Cowan                                   cowan@ccil.org
One art/there is/no less/no more/All things/to do/with sparks/galore
	--Douglas Hofstadter

References:
- [lojban] mo
  - From: Elrond <grey.havens@earthling.net>

Prev by Date: Re: [lojban] polyadic connectives
Next by Date: Re: [lojban] mo
Previous by thread: Re: [lojban] mo
Next by thread: Re: [lojban] mo
Index(es):
- Date
- Thread