Re: [lojban] Toward a {ce'u} record

[John Cowan <cowan@ccil.org>]

pycyn@aol.com scripsit:

> I don't know; I didn't think of it.  Is it legal?  I don't see why not 
> immediately.  Is it generalizable?  Less clear, because of the vaguenss of 
> the {rV} series,

Actually, "ri" is sharp; only "ra" and "ru" are vague.

> Are there rules about anaphora of bound variables other than repetition 
> within scope?

In general, "ri" skips things where the meaning is the same on repetition:
"ri" skips "mi" and "do" and "ko'a" and "da".  But it certainly should
not skip "ce'u", since repeating "ce'u" is something quite different.

-- 
John Cowan           http://www.ccil.org/~cowan              cowan@ccil.org
Please leave your values        |       Check your assumptions.  In fact,
   at the front desk.           |          check your assumptions at the door.
     --sign in Paris hotel      |            --Miles Vorkosigan