[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]

Re: status of ka (was Re: [lojban] x3 of du'u

And Rosta wrote:


1. inside ka: fill every logically-present but syntactically absent
place with ce'u


Certainly a plausible interpretation rule.


2. outside ka: fill every logically-present but syntactically absent
place with zo'e


No problem.


3. (1-2) constitute the ONLY difference between ka and du'u (except
for the godawful x2 of du'u which I wish had Died In The A).


Indeed.  I favor, as I said, using lu'e le du'u


poi'i [[ [NU] ] x1 is such that poi'i abstraction is true; x1 binds
ke'a within the abstraction.


Can you provide a concrete example of such an abstraction, and an
x1 that would make it true?  I don't understand this.

--
Not to perambulate             || John Cowan <jcowan@reutershealth.com>
   the corridors               || http://www.reutershealth.com
during the hours of repose     || http://www.ccil.org/~cowan
   in the boots of ascension.  \\ Sign in Austrian ski-resort hotel