Re: status of ka (was Re: [lojban] x3 of du'u

["Jorge Llambias" <jjllambias@hotmail.com>]

la and cusku di'e

> The convention would be:
>
> 1. inside ka: fill every logically-present but syntactically absent place 
> with
> ce'u

I don't like this at all. What is a "logically-present" place?
I want {le ka ce'u dunda} to be the property of being a giver,
and {le ka dunda ce'u} the property of being a gift.

> poi'i [[ [NU] ] x1 is such that poi'i abstraction is true; x1 binds ke'a 
> within the abstraction.

Would it be equivalent to {du da poi}?

mu'o mi'e xorxes



_________________________________________________________________
Get your FREE download of MSN Explorer at http://explorer.msn.com/intl.asp