Re: [lojban] RE: mine, etc.

[John Cowan <cowan@ccil.org>]

And Rosta scripsit:

> Out of interest, why is this? Is it because otherwise MOI wouldn't be
> LALR1?

yes.

> What about if MOI preceded the Operand?

Probably; I'd have to YACC it and see.

-gua!spi, following Chinese, use a prefixed "moi".

-- 
John Cowan           http://www.ccil.org/~cowan              cowan@ccil.org
Please leave your values        |       Check your assumptions.  In fact,
   at the front desk.           |          check your assumptions at the door.
     --sign in Paris hotel      |            --Miles Vorkosigan