Re: [lojban] ko'a klama .isecaubo mi djuno

[John Cowan <cowan@ccil.org>]

Adam Raizen scripsit:

> I've come to the conclusion that "broda .i+stag+bo brode" doesn't
> necessarily imply both broda and brode (depending of the meaning of
> the tag). It's certainly not the case in "broda .inajenai brode". ".i"
> is supposed to be the unspecified logical connection between
> sentences, not a short version of ".ije".

Actually, .i is a long scope version of .ije, not unspecified
connection.  And i+stag+bo does assert both sentences unless
there is a negation involved.

-- 
John Cowan           http://www.ccil.org/~cowan              cowan@ccil.org
Please leave your values        |       Check your assumptions.  In fact,
   at the front desk.           |          check your assumptions at the door.
     --sign in Paris hotel      |            --Miles Vorkosigan