la pycyn cusku di'e
> Yes, {ni} is a short form of {ka sela'u makau} just like > {jei} is a short form of {du'u xukau}. At least that's the meaning > they have from usage, if not from their definition. Well, not really, since {ka} is going to be a property (etc.) not a quantity, so the first doesn't work. The second equation has beenconsistently rejected since forever, for pretty much the same reason" a truthvalue is not a proposition.
You didn't read what I wrote. I know that they are _defined_ as quantity and truth value, but they are _used_ only as property and proposition. mu'o mi'e xorxes _________________________________________________________________ Get your FREE download of MSN Explorer at http://explorer.msn.com/intl.asp