[lojban] Re: "zo da bu" should not be valid (was Re: Re: My parser, SI, SA, and ZOI)

[Robin Lee Powell <rlpowell@digitalkingdom.org>]

On Thu, May 13, 2004 at 11:37:16AM -0700, Jorge Llamb?as wrote:
> 
> --- Robin Lee Powell <rlpowell@digitalkingdom.org> wrote:
> > On Wed, May 12, 2004 at 11:30:29PM -0700, Robin Lee Powell wrote:
> > > zo takes a single Lojban word.  bu takes a single Lobjan word.  si
> > > takes as single word, or an arbitrary string of non-Lojban text.
> > > 
> > > This is how they are defined.
> > 
> > zei as well; "le lojbo zo irk zei seljmaji vreji" is invalid, but
> > "le lojbo irk zei seljmaji vreji" is fine.
> 
> What about "irk zei seljmaji bu"? That one is currently allowed.

I'm calling that a bug in grammar.300's ZEI handling, and holding up all
the other pre-processor tokens and the BNF as evidence.  It also
violates the definitions.

-Robin

-- 
http://www.digitalkingdom.org/~rlpowell/  ***  I'm a *male* Robin.
"Many philosophical problems are caused by such things as the simple
inability to shut up." -- David Stove, liberally paraphrased.
http://www.lojban.org/  ***  loi pimlu na srana .i ti rokci morsi